“Origin of Species” and ICO-TIN – The Difference Between Earth and Rest

November 24, 1859. The day “the origin of the species” was published and a unique theory of the existence of the world, the causes of existence and the different species, the evolution and the processes of survival were introduced. The oldest and most enduring longevity was the amoeba and others of the same type. They have all gone through ups and downs; Through the rough stages presented by Mother Nature.

“Origin of Species” was a kind of book written for everyone, anyone could read and understand. It was preferred and popular among all classes of students, researchers, scientists or dreamers. It was popular worldwide because of its neutral outlook and extensive language. The theories are still applicable and the book proved to be helpful for future biological and relative theoretical experiments and practical applications regarding the origin and evolution of different species on Earth.

Relative similarities between “species origin” and blockchain:
If Satoshi Nakamoto is the “Darwin” of the crypto era and cryptography is the “origin of species”, then it all exists in the world we live in and has a significant impact worldwide. It is understood that, although eventually, by almost the whole world, it has become a popular and widely recognized event.

Although other cryptocurrencies have failed to survive and have lost their existence in the winds of change and evolution, just like the previous “single cell” organism, before the amoeba. Bitcoin, the most worthy of the species, has been the “amoeba” of this relative conjecture. It has been the reason, inspiration and benchmark for other, more complex organisms to follow it. These organisms, for example, Ethereum, were introduced with a new concept of implementation, which was the ICO (initial currency offer). By comparison, the natural principles of development, nutrition, growth, and reproduction are common to all.

Discussion, scientific and religious, for time and long:
“Origin of the species” has given rise to various heated discussions, scientific-practical, and religious-orthodox, and so has the blockchain. The Orthodox community, or the influential religious groups at the time, were not so flexible as to allow any new theory to prevail in the society they had long ruled. Similarly, the financial system that has been influential since the introduction of society with money and currency does not want to change and has been inflexible in its set trend for centuries. It probably fears the importance it could lose if its policies are replaced.

The book is a long-running conspiracy, and that reign is known as the “Eclipse of Darwinism,” from 1880 to 1930. Despite all the evidence and explanations, the “origin of the species” has long been kept from “acceptance” by the “responsible”. People were limited to talking about “Darwin’s theory” in public or on social platforms. The current time frame can be compared to the same realm where people cannot talk about “cryptography” in financial meetings or forums related to centralized banks or financially related social platforms, where the monopolist is a butler and lender of big old banks. Company

Coexistence and Definition of “Evolution”:
Similarly, since the “origin of species”, new icons have been exchanged for cryptocurrencies and many more enthusiasts with similar theories of world evolution. Darwin’s theory was then found and proved to be practical and applicable, but also conducive to new biological discoveries. Similarly, the concept of ICO (Initial Currency Offer) was introduced to the world. This led to a revolution in the crypto world by opening the door for the financial participation of “non-technical” individuals.

As before, the concept has been questioned, challenged, and unfortunately, due to some irregularities and initial failure to implement some applications (although it had a very low proportion compared to successful ones), critics got a chance. Celebrate.

ICO-Tin, the afterlife for “Darwin”:
“Origin of species”, later found as a definition and explanation of the evolution of the various species of the earth in comparison. It was also explained, what is the difference between the Earth’s habitat, probably with other planets, due to which, life was probably not possible anywhere else. Darwin did not speak; Neither did Nakamoto, about “ICOs”.

ICOs have been challenged as a concept by global authorities and “religious” organizations. This “religious” (rigid in policy and dissatisfied with change) financial system has its own limitations. They give strict orders for every new integration or test, introduction or innovation in the system. These orders continue to be a “dead-end” for ICOs nowadays.

ICO-TIN should appear in the picture, with a further explanation and consolidation of the “inflexible order” policy of “religious organizations” to provide a window into that “dead-end” for the ICO. In order to provide the essential habitat for ICOs and to distinguish “Earth” from other planets, ICO-TIN creates a secure middle ground between the progressive ICO and the “religious” old financial system.

ICO-TIN. The environment, and the ocean.
The difference between the other planets is obviously the availability of air and water around the habitable environment. How Darwin defined it is that “life finds a way”. Of course, it was. ICO-TIN has found a way to take ICOs to the next level and make things safer and more mutually beneficial.

The challenges and how ICO-TIN creates a mutually beneficial platform for people, as well as the ICO initiating teams, can both be analyzed and understood in the research explained below.

Now the challenges of launching an ICO are as follows:

1) Smart contracts have their own limits. It can either disclose the address to which the cryptocurrency must be transferred, this is a unique address related to a specific ICO, and once the address is disclosed to everyone or at least a large number of people interested in participating in the ICO, they always enter to make a payment. Can

2) The longer the contract exists, the more effective it is, but the more codes there are, the more gas it consumes per transaction. So prolonging a smart contract is not effective at all.

3) At a time when an ICO cannot accept more than 14 transactions per second, there is an auction situation. In this situation, the set parameters encourage to complete the transaction in any way possible regardless of the price of gas.

4) Such a view is created when an SPF or single point failure occurs.

5) Consent is another article that should be taken care of, where two things need to be covered.

The first is the KYC process, which is more complicated than the others because it has to be combined with an image upload which makes the system quite vulnerable to hack threats and malware.

The second is accounting, which is a big task to regulate and verify again because the exchange has different cryptocurrencies and no one wants to change the mode of payment which he does not use frequently.

6) Strategy formulation must be very planned and flawless. It covers three aspects, now that these three aspects are set in the traditional way of ICOs, these three ways were:

Auctions – where a set pattern is judged, which transaction should be preferred, based on the fact that any transaction is backed up with a higher price for GAS.

Bounty – Grants are usually given to participants or non-participants to introduce more people to the program or ICO. This donation has often been the number of tokens.

GAS – Gas has been a very important factor in ICO launches as there are many transactions left and even a very small amount of transactions are completed after consuming the same amount of GAS.

Application and Essentials of ICO-TIN

ICO-TIN is the answer to all those challenges. No one was busy developing their technical and crypto-related skills and was keen enough to be skilled or smart enough to face the challenges of the underworld market.

It’s more of a “professional” approach. Since one is paid for something, one has to be great at it. Anyone can cut his hair, but we like a barber because he knows his job well. It explains the essentials of a professional package called ICO-TIN.

It provides an enterprise solution for new ICO launches and a customized package that includes ICO launches and marketing.

The solutions to the problems are as follows:

1) Smart contracts will not be available for access; Unique addresses will not be disclosed to any of the participants. There will be parallel and more secure ways to pay.

2) There will be an easy way to pay, through any payment method, (FIAT currency and BTC and) one has to buy USD in the system and his subsequent purchase will be handled with that USD.

3) this entire system will be an “off-chain” program, somehow integrated with the system; So there will be no transaction, no GAS cost during the transaction made by the participants

4) Payments made by the system will be regulated by the periodic savings of GAS, and therefore will be a minimum liability for the transaction.

5) There will be no auction for the transaction and so the cost of GAS will not be a problem anyway.

6) KYC and accounts will be handled differently, with a system that will not align directly with the ICO, so uploading images will not be a threat to the ICO.

7) Accounts will be handled perfectly by individuals and this can be done more efficiently.

Although taking the “origin of species” to a new level was a challenge for biologists and others associated with it, they did not allow Darwin’s work and contributions to go in vain. Similarly, it has been our responsibility to pass on this vision to the next generation and to encourage today’s progressive youth.

Considering “ICO-TIN” as a modified version of “Nakamoto’s” Origin of Species “, it is not at all overly ambitious. This opens the way for further tests and possibilities to bring the “two worlds” together.